Why doesn't Erlang come with a decent package management system like gem? -


Well, it looks a bit like a lion, but I was wondering if there is a technical reason that the array By default there is a proper package management system.

No major technical reason is actually in the form of a classic method of installing and installing Yerling software There are different requirements though the applications are there. And some release release added in that.

Often you can see the altoglot software completely self-reliant. This is that all the libraries and virtual machines have been put together in the package and there is no need for external dependencies. You can also see it in the development versions of the package. For example, the source of the database is a dependent library of all sources in the tree.

It is coming from Ruby (like mine), as many people think that this is not a bad idea. In this way, each application is self dependent since one of Erlang's main goals is the most reliable thing, it understands every sense in the world that each application can have its own version of the library, thus ensuring that an app The other does not shaky


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

sql - dynamically varied number of conditions in the 'where' statement using LINQ -

asp.net mvc - Dynamically Generated Ajax.BeginForm -

Debug on symbian -