project management - Programming time schedule for porting a program -


I am working on a large program that has an abstract GUI API, it is very GUI based, many dialogs and some dirty There are symptoms that are heavily dependent on the message flow of the GUI (the right sequence of focus / mouse / active handling, etc.) - not easy for port

Now I am currently using Fox toolkit to make it native cocoa / Want to close in MFC

I give myself a deadline till the end of the year but my main job will be to continue the development work with the existing toolkit, but

My question is how do I spend my time Do you spend

  1. Stop working on the main program and 90% of the GUI port (about 3 months)
  2. Divide everything in one month's short sessions
  3. Appointment for the Monday / Tuesday GUI Project and for the rest of the week
  4. To end the first app, then the port.

I think there are three arguments for which I need balance.

  1. Inspiration, I want to see something that is going on both projects
  2. For both brain function overflow, much more detail is needed in both my brains and sometimes, Ever enough just enough is enough.
  3. I think porting is interwoven so porting will require many code changes in the existing code and the new code will be written at that time.

If there is no planned release to customers, then you have the same structure of work Being able to do is luxury.

My first impression is that attempts to eliminate the app on the current platform, when you want to remove that code, at least partially in vain time (you learn something but the last There is no use of code).

Personally I'll park the current version and start with it will rewrite cocoa.

First of all, I'll split it into functional parts and see everyone as an agile style release. These end user should be focused on work and tasks, and both of them include the GUI and work at the end of the bench.

(The reason I do not like the idea of ​​working through GUI and app logic is that they are no different. There may be opportunities to improve as part of a rewrite, and if you It is difficult if you want to keep them compatible. A rewrite is an opportunity to make fundamental changes that often do not come together - I 'd take it.)

Before moving on to the next one, work through a functional fragmentation one by one, getting into a complete, releaseable state. This will give you the sense of achievement and the ability to measure progress. It also means that if any execution exits from anywhere, then you are a completely usable part.

In addition to this, focusing on the end of the task, hopefully the overflow of mind is reduced because you always have a specific area than a single app.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

sql - dynamically varied number of conditions in the 'where' statement using LINQ -

I am using my first project LINQ (in mvc), so maybe there's something very simple that I remember. However, a day of searching and experimenting does not work, so it works. I am trying to write a LINQ query (Linux to SQL) in which in many cases where the statement is different from an OR or an AND. We do not know how many conditions are going in the query till runtime. This search is for filter control, where the user can choose multiple criteria for filtering. Select from table where table.col = 1 or table.col = 2 or table.col = 7 .... 'Other number of conditions Before I just create the SQL query as a string, while looping over all the situations. However, it seems that there should be a good way to do this in LINQ. I tried to use Expression trees, but they had a second thought for this moment on my head, where the lambda function was to be executed inside the statement such as: values ​​for matchingRows = matchingRows for each value Where (function (row) row.c...
Read more

asp.net mvc - Dynamically Generated Ajax.BeginForm -

I have a problem with ASP.NET MVC Ajax forms. I generate many Ajax form in a table such as: & Lt; Input type = "submit" name = "activity" value = "add activity" / & gt; & Lt;%}% & gt; & Lt; / TD & gt; & Lt; / TR & gt; & Lt;%}% & gt; So far so good. When I post one of those forms, it gives a partial view in a div, and in this new partial view a new Ajax Beginnform (which is not in Genesis form) This second Ajax Beginnorf is exactly like the ones I got on the table, but when I post it, I do not get the "Ajax Post", but a normal post that sends me to a new page, I do not know whether the two Ajax forms What is the reason for the difference between, why is it the "dynamically generated" Ajax form behaves like a normal HTML form? By the way, I know that I can do it in different ways using javascript, but I would like to understand whether it can only be done using MVC helplars and Ajax lib...
Read more

Debug on symbian -

I am using trk for phone debug This works well for the Holorld project But when I start the project in phone debug mode 1) the load failed 2) TrkProtocolPlugin: to target the specified file Failure (please verify If any body understands what problem I am experiencing, then this problem helps me Pre-release If the application has the privileges assigned (with the appropriate certificate) itemprop = "text" > In your case, I will check: / li> If there is no conflict of application ID with any other application of device If there are problematic commands in the installation package (for example copy copy for non-accessible directories)
Read more