data binding - ASP.NET ListView with identical markup in EditItemTemplate and InsertItemTemplate -


I have a ListView that includes an EditItemTemplate and an InsertItemTemplate. Two forms share almost all of their markup, for example: 

  & lt; Asp: listview runat = "server" ... & gt; & Lt; Layouttemplate & gt; ... & lt; / Layouttemplate & gt; & Lt; ItemTemplate & gt; & Lt; P & gt; & Lt;% # Eval ("name")%> & Lt; / P & gt; & Lt; P & gt; & Lt;% # Eval ("title")%> & Lt; / P & gt; ... & lt; / Itemtemplate & gt; & Lt; Insertitemtemplate & gt; & Lt; P & gt; Name: & lt; Asp: textbox runat = server text = '& lt;% # bind ("name")%> / & Gt; & Lt; / P & gt; & Lt; P & gt; Title: & lt; Asp: textbox runat = server text = '& lt;% # bind ("title")% & gt; / & Gt; & Lt; / P & gt; ... & lt; Asp: button runat = server commandname = "insert" text = "save" /> & Lt; / Insertitemtemplate & gt; & Lt; Edititemtemplate & gt; & Lt; P & gt; Name: & lt; Asp: textbox runat = server text = '& lt;% # bind ("name")%> / & Gt; & Lt; / P & gt; & Lt; P & gt; Title: & lt; Asp: textbox runat = server text = '& lt;% # bind ("title")% & gt; / & Gt; & Lt; / P & gt; ... & lt; Asp: button runat = server commandname = "update" text = "save" /> & Lt; / Edititemtemplate & gt; & Lt; / ASP: List View & gt;

Of course, there's really a lot going on in the insert and edit templates (too many fields, formatting, verification, etc.), and I hate to keep it

& lt; Insertitemtemplate & gt;

My first thought was to move all the shared markup into a user control (.ascx):

& lt; Custom: myform runat = server / & gt; & Lt; Asp: button runat = server commandname = "insert" text = "save" /> & Lt; / Insertitemtemplate & gt; & Lt; Edititemtemplate & gt; & Lt; Custom: myform runat = server / & gt; & Lt; Asp: button runat = server commandname = "update" text = "save" /> & Lt; / Edititemtemplate & gt; Unfortunately, the two-sided binding (text = '& lt;% # bind ("foo")%>') works only when the form is in user control (it does not carry data from control back into the database is).

To include an optional file, it will be necessary to move all the share markup. Server-side Classic is behind the ASP, but they still work in ASP.NET and can be useful in such situations, because the content of the file contained in it behaves just like markup on the page is done.

But the files contained in it still have a bit to be done, and their disadvantages (such as VisualStudio are not very comfortable with them). Is there any alternative?

I have created a custom list view that makes this simple if there is no one involved, EditItemTemplate Used for both: 

  Private sub-list view_init (e-mail as the object, in the form of a by object in the form of the object). Me.Init handles if Me.InsertItemTemplate is nothing then me. InsertItemTemplate = Me.EditItemTemplate End if End Sub

I have also created a custom "Save" button that changes my order name between "Update" and "Insert" as appropriate : 

  The Private Sub handles the SaveLinkButton_Click (byVal Sender as the object, as System.EventArgs as ByVal E). Dim_ListView Control as in Control LISTView = GetListView () If _ListView IsNot is nothing then Me.BindingContainer _ListView .EditItem then Me.CommandName = "Update" Else Me.CommandName = "End if End End End if End End"

(The GetListView function moves the parent of the button until this f Inds a ListView.)

This is - it is useful for anyone. / P>


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

sql - dynamically varied number of conditions in the 'where' statement using LINQ -

I am using my first project LINQ (in mvc), so maybe there's something very simple that I remember. However, a day of searching and experimenting does not work, so it works. I am trying to write a LINQ query (Linux to SQL) in which in many cases where the statement is different from an OR or an AND. We do not know how many conditions are going in the query till runtime. This search is for filter control, where the user can choose multiple criteria for filtering. Select from table where table.col = 1 or table.col = 2 or table.col = 7 .... 'Other number of conditions Before I just create the SQL query as a string, while looping over all the situations. However, it seems that there should be a good way to do this in LINQ. I tried to use Expression trees, but they had a second thought for this moment on my head, where the lambda function was to be executed inside the statement such as: values ​​for matchingRows = matchingRows for each value Where (function (row) row.c...
Read more

asp.net mvc - Dynamically Generated Ajax.BeginForm -

I have a problem with ASP.NET MVC Ajax forms. I generate many Ajax form in a table such as: & Lt; Input type = "submit" name = "activity" value = "add activity" / & gt; & Lt;%}% & gt; & Lt; / TD & gt; & Lt; / TR & gt; & Lt;%}% & gt; So far so good. When I post one of those forms, it gives a partial view in a div, and in this new partial view a new Ajax Beginnform (which is not in Genesis form) This second Ajax Beginnorf is exactly like the ones I got on the table, but when I post it, I do not get the "Ajax Post", but a normal post that sends me to a new page, I do not know whether the two Ajax forms What is the reason for the difference between, why is it the "dynamically generated" Ajax form behaves like a normal HTML form? By the way, I know that I can do it in different ways using javascript, but I would like to understand whether it can only be done using MVC helplars and Ajax lib...
Read more

Debug on symbian -

I am using trk for phone debug This works well for the Holorld project But when I start the project in phone debug mode 1) the load failed 2) TrkProtocolPlugin: to target the specified file Failure (please verify If any body understands what problem I am experiencing, then this problem helps me Pre-release If the application has the privileges assigned (with the appropriate certificate) itemprop = "text" > In your case, I will check: / li> If there is no conflict of application ID with any other application of device If there are problematic commands in the installation package (for example copy copy for non-accessible directories)
Read more