Are there any drawbacks of "asynchronous tracking" with Google Analytics? -
I have recently learned that Google Analytics offers so-called offers, in addition to the traditional tracking code. From documentation, it seems that asynchronous tracking is preferred on the basis of traditional tracking:
Unlike conventional installation, asynchronous optimizes tracking how browsers load the ga.js so that Its effect on the user experience can be reduced. This allows you to delay your analytics snippet on content coming from higher rendering.
There is no flaw in using the asynchronous tracking in the document, so I know why it is not the default tracking method is there any loss around any asynchronous tracking that anyone knows Should, or should I move on and switch to all installations?
Async tracking was released only 2 months ago. They are beta testing all over the web before they are spewing, they only hear in trouble that people have something that Google calls on their installation page:
We It is determined that on most pages, the optimum location for the asynchronous snippet is at the top & lt; Body & gt; Section Although this JavaScript code is & lt; Head & gt; In the customary section, placing the asynchronous snippet can trigger a parsing bug in Internet Explorer 6 and 7 on some pages. The easiest solution to this problem is to put it at the top of the section.
Comments
Post a Comment